Customers Strike Back
Customer vengeance stories always put a smile on my face. Here, two brothers strike back at Apple and get results.
Friday, December 12, 2003
Customers Strike Back
Posted by John at 12/12/2003 03:36:00 PM
Thursday, December 11, 2003
A Man in Pain
Robert Musil has a critique of my piece about former Vice President Gore's endorsement of former Governor Howard Dean. So I sent him an email, which follows:
#1> "Obvious reasons Gore didn't run:" 1. popular incumbents generally win re-election. President Bush is a popular incumbent. 2. Gore needed distance from the 2000 defeat, 3. Money. He wasn't raising any money. And he didn't have any money (by upper elite measurement) of his own.
#2> Of course the Dean network is not a piece of software that can be inserted, like a CD, into the Gore computer or the Clinton computer or whatever. It's a peer network and not a client-server model. But it is, stand alone, a powerful force (ask John Kerry, Dick Gephardt, et alia) and because it is a network, based upon shared values, I would argue that Howard Dean's charisma (such as it is) is not the connective tissue. The Dean network is about community and force multiplication (in political terms). Dean may lose or win, but the community his campaign has created will endure regardless of the outcome and how that community feels about 2008 will be significant/important.
Successful presidential campaigns are successful because large (or significant) constituencies compel them forward. The largest, most significant constituency in the Democratic Party is the Dean-o network. If the majority of them coalesce around someone in 2008, that someone will have a solid base from which to run a campaign for the 2008 Demo Prexy nomination. Combine it with Gore's other strengths as a candidate (labor support and the like) and you have the makings of a possibly winning operation.
Obviously, no one knows what will happen (Gore or Dean or Hillary or me, for that matter). But if you were looking to begin to engage the Dean network as allies in the 2008 campaign, you could not have done a better job of it than Gore did this week.
#3> Airliners and Mt. Fuji.....Nixon won landslide in 1972, minimal GOP gains in Congressional races (and this was when, pre-redistricting software, there were Congressional races!), Reagan won landslide in 1984, virtually no GOP gains at all, Bush wins half-landslide in 1988, Connie Mack elected to the US Senate in FL (the only coat-tail).
On paper, it seems unlikely that the Democratic candidate (unless it's Sharpton) will win less than 44% of the vote and the various modeling that has been done suggests a 53-47% outcome (Bush wins) and a 60-100 point spread in the electoral college. It ain't Mt. Fuji, it's just a routine case of a popular incumbent winning re-election by a comfortable margin.
I will grant you that the Dems are likely to lose Senate seats in the South, but that was expected long before it was expected that Howard Dean would be the nominee.
Thanks for the kind words at the top of your piece.
Posted by John at 12/11/2003 12:26:00 PM
Obits That Make You Go "Huh?"
From today's NYT obituary of Wall Street Journal editorial page editor Robert Bartley:
Tension between the editorial and news-gathering sides of a newspaper is hardly unusual, given their contrasting missions. But it was particularly true at The Journal, where beat reporters would sometimes engage Mr. Bartley about how wrong they felt he was, or how hard his editorials were making it for them to be perceived by the outside world as writing objectively.
The notion that the "outside world" perceives journalists as "objective" is something only a journalist could believe.
Posted by John at 12/11/2003 11:01:00 AM
Tuesday, December 09, 2003
On the Internet, People Say: "Huh?"
New York Times columnist David Brooks opines:
"On the Internet, the long term doesn't matter, as long as you are blunt and forceful at that moment. On the Internet, a new persona is just a click away. On the Internet, everyone is loosely tethered, careless and free. Dean is the Internet man, a string of exhilarating moments and daring accusations."
Does anyone have any idea what he's talking about? I particularly like the assertion that "(o)n the Internet, everyone is loosely tethered, careless and free." This is stuff you would give a seventh-grader back for re-write. It's embarrassingly stupid.
Posted by John at 12/09/2003 02:20:00 PM